Showing posts with label zeiss. Show all posts
Showing posts with label zeiss. Show all posts

17 Apr 2012

Visceral Attack at The Moorings Bar

I went to Aberdeen last weekend to meet up with a friend and hit the pubs for a good night out but while at The Moorings Bar (an awesome rock bar in town) I got side tracked as a band walked on stage to play a set, it was the headliner of the evening and their name was Visceral Attack. As soon as they started playing I was blown away by their energy, the singer was going nuts and was actually in the crowd for the whole show  which was pretty cool while the rest of the band expelled a massive wall of sound that instantly made me put down my drink, stop chatting and turn to the stage. The music was heavy and combined with the pure raw energy I was compelled to grab my camera (which I didn't intend to use, I just had it in my bag) and get up front and document what was going on. I tried to capture the visceral movement that was being unleashed by the whole band and especially vocalist Chris Mc Cabe. By the end of the few songs I photographed I felt drained trying to keep up with Chris and the band (crazy amount of energy, they certainly put in a shift), I am lucky I have spent years shooting in fast paced situations with manual focus lenses as there was no way any autofocus was going to keep up with this singer. All I can say is that it was good fun to photograph them and it's rare that a band make me grab my camera when i'm not intending to. They put on a great show with very cool heavy music and boundless energy. 


If your into heavy music and see these guys are touring in your area then I recommend heading out and catching the show, will be well worth it. 


You can check out their Webpage here and facebook page here 


Here are some of the shots from this impromptu live shoot of Visceral Attack at The Moorings Bar in Aberdeen, Scotland. 



















21 Aug 2011

World War Z Set At Night

I took a wander through the World War Z film set on Friday night on my way to the pub, It looks really cool at night time with all the lights. Here are a couple of shots I took on our way through.



andrew@drewportfolio.com

Both shots taken with the Carl Zeiss  Distagon T* 35mm f2



16 Aug 2011

Carl Zeiss Distagon 35 f2 ZE (Initial Thoughts)



My new lens purchase. I have been looking to add to my lens line up for mt Canon 5d mk 2 for a while now. To be honest I had been feeling a little unimpressed with the range of Canon lenses on offer, not that they to don't perform well and create great images as they do. I have used mainly Canon lenses for a while and have beeen the staple for all the images I have shot but alongside them I have been shooting old manual focus lenses such as my Olympus zuiko 100mm f2.8, Olympus 24mm and Haminex 28mm f2.8 (shooting for fun, not on jobs) and to be honest I enjoyed the process much more with them, I can't explain why, although i think that it could be that I feel more involved with the image (manual focus etc).

Since I have went pro recently I have been looking at the Canon L series and the cheaper yet good prime EF lens range. I thought these were my only options. But I recently tried and bought a Sigma 85 f1.4 as after extensive testing I liked it more in a practical sense than any of the canon 85's and it got me starting to think about 3rd party lenses as an alternative to the canons (if they perform well that is, not just for the sake of it, I have nothing against Canon).

This is when I actually thought about selling all my Canon kit and getting a Leica m9 as after trying a Leica m8 with a Zeiss 28mm f2.8 lens I fell in love with how the lenses functioned(such smooth manual focus and operation) and the high build quality and sharpness straight out of camera. Then on second thoughts I actually really did like the 5D MK2 for its great high ISO performance (Leica is not there yet in ISO abilities) I shoot in lowlight a lot and don't use flash all that much so decided to stick with the Canon.

I loved that the Zeiss lens I used on the M8 was made of metal and felt so sturdy, I wouldn't ever worry about in a field situation, felt like it was built to last forever, I hate the plastic construction of the canon lenses and I have went through a few.

So I started to look into the Carl Zeiss lens range for the Canon mount (the ZE line) as I had heard great things in the past about their wide angle 21mm f2.8 but never really looked too much into it at the time. After a quick search online a lot of great praise was found for nearly all the Zeiss line with the exception of the Zeiss 50 f1.4 and 85 f1.4 when used wide open (or so I have been told, I'm sure their fine though if you know how to use them).

I saw that a lot of pros said that they loved them but wouldn't use the on assignment due to them being manual focus only, but I thought screw that, I have been manually focusing since getting into cameras as I find that when working quick and close autofocus can be quite unreliable (atleast in my experiences). The Zeiss lenses do have the autofocus confirmation when it hits the focus so really you have the best of both worlds but within a much better built body and in some cases superior image quality.

I have heard a lot about the Zeiss 3d rendering quality, people saying that is just amazing and can't be reached by any Canon L lens. The Zeiss in a lot of cases are cheaper than the Canons or around the same price. All this sounds great but I thought it must be too good to be true.

So I thought F**k it and just ordered the Zeiss Distagon 35 f2 which is a focal length I have wanted for a long time (and was about the same focal length equivalent  as the 28mm i used on the Leica m8) and the Canon ef 35 f2 is plastic with a pretty crap manual focus ring (but is nice and light) and the Canon 35 f1.4 L costs over £400 more than the zeiss but does have that nice 1.4 though. I really wanted to try the zeiss though.

It arrived today and I really wasn't expecting too much to be honest but when I opened the box I was immediately impressed with the look and build and it was actually a lot lighter than I thought which was a nice surprise. After mounting it on the camera it felt really nice, well balanced on the 5D MK2  and with the EG-S precision matte focus screen manual focus is very easy and everything snaps into focus no problem and the focus conformation works really well too for when you don't want to rely solely on your eye to do the work.

After taking a few shots with it (nothing to interesting yet as it's raining outside and nothing worth posting) I now understand what people say about the Zeiss rendering. It just looks amazing. The colours straight out of camera are really nice, better than any canon lens I have used (in my opinion) and I have used  a good amount of L's in the past. The images from at least this lens do have that 3d rendering quality and it is sharp from f2, there is some vignetting at f2 but is to be expected and is no problem when in actual use and actually gives the images a great look. It makes Jpegs out of camera look really good which is a feat.

I have only shot a couple of images so far but I wanted to write this as I was so impressed and it actually has already surpassed my expectations which is something I have yet to experience with any other lens. I am now already considering another purchase maybe the 28 f2 for that slightly wider field of view in tight situations. My only regret in buying this lens is that I didn't get the new 35 f1.4 version but that is bigger, heavier and more expensive at around £1500.

I think if you can do without autofocus (you do get autofocus confirmation though) then the Zeiss line is a great investment, well I can at least confirm that the 35 f2 is a stunning lens and I will be purchasing more (probably the wider lenses though, the 28 , 25 or 21). I still have my Canon 50 f1.4, Sigma 85 f1.4 and I am still very happy with their results (well maybe not the 50 too much wide open) but for moments when I want autofocus and for traditional portraits these will still be my go to lenses I haven't given up the Canon's yet but the Zeiss image quality makes me want to. Certain situations call for certain lenses and as long as you use the right one for you to get the best image, thats all that matters.  I love though that for that photojournalistic, street and environmental portraits I will have my Zeiss 35 to go to from now on.

I am not a fan of reviews that photograph test charts to judge lenses and much prefer to read what people think after taking some real world shots and experiences. While looking at this lens I didn't find too much info on it in this manner so thought I would do a quick write up (which has turned into a long write up) and I will do a follow up once I have shot with it a bit more. I just hope this might help someone who was in the same position as me looking at the Zeiss line (or at least this 35 f2).

Cheers!

www.drewportfolio.com

UPDATE!! SOME QUICK TEST IMAGES!

These files really have barely been touched in post. I put on my usual sharpening that I do on all my images (just a small amount) and boosted the contrast a little on a few but for most part this is all the lens.
Some are straight out of camera JPEG which is something I have never been impressed with before.
The images aren't good but I just wanted to do a quick test.


Shot at f2 and focused on the silver barrier in the middle of the image.
Pretty damn good for f2, I love the contrast and clarity. 


This is just a black and white version of the above image for reference. 
I love the straight out of camera B&W's, This lens makes me 
want to shoot JPeg it is so good in clarity, colour and contrast.


Hello! Me in my bathroom mirror (the top of the mirror is steamed up as I wasn't 
long out the shower. Very nice feeling to this image. Shot at f2 and focused on my hair.


Me taken by Cat in Bar Bloc. I wanted to test my new Zeiss lens in a lowlight environment but the light on Cat at this part of the bar was pretty crap and all the cool bar lights were behind me so she took a couple shots to get that lovely out of focus goodness. Look how nice that lens renders the colours, beautiful! Zeiss lenses from now on I thinks. Hardly anything to do in post and sharp wide open, love it.  Getting the 28 now too, I've got the bug. 


On the set of new film World War Z, starring Brad Pitt.
The guy with the umbrella was the main focus, I like the girl talking to the worker with the ladder too. A lot going on here, I like it. 



Straight out of camera JPEG with the smallest amount of contrast added (pretty much nothing +1 i think). It was about to rain bad and I saw this homeless guy that hangs around this area leaning against the rail (just to the right of the centre of the frame) so put the lens to f2 and focused on him. Again great image quality and this is a jpeg straight out of camera, crazy good. Cuts my post processing
time down to pretty much nothing, amazing and thats with Raw files too. 


Another straight out of camera JPEG with a very small amount of contrast added (+1 I think, very small amount). Again it was a very dull and rainy day and thats why the image is so dark. I love how
the Zeiss rendered the shot. F2 focused on the water droplets. 

Thats it for now. I am very impressed with this lens. Very sharp, great colour and great contrast and it makes JPEG's straight out of camera look great which is unreal and after processing Raw files the images are even more stunning and thats without doing to much to the file atall, less than I normally do with my other leneses. Love this 35 and will be checking out either the 28 or 21 Zeiss in the very near future.

Places to follow me online:










18 Jul 2011

Leica M8 Test



At the weekend I purchased a camera that I have always wanted to get my hands on, a Leica M8, well i wanted an M9 but thats not in the bank balances reach at the moment. I got it with a new Zeiss 28mm f2.8  (a great relatively inexpensive lens).

I love the feel of the camera, I love how it functions and I love how small it is. The high ISO range is fairly crap really but I was expecting this. The one problem I found though was that there is a vertical line on all high ISO images which is pretty unacceptable considering I wanted to use this as part of my professional kit as a small accompaniment to my 5d mark 2. There is also a red and a green pixel which appears in all images regardless of ISO which is a pain. Needless to say I will be returning the camera as I can't  use it and I'm not sure whether to get it fixed and returned to me or to just get some nice lenses for my 5d (a 35 f1.4 or 24 f1.4 and 135 f2).

It's a shame about the ISO performance of this camera but it is 6 years old digital technology and I can't afford an m9 which should have at least a stop better performance I would think. The files have much less room for play than any digital SLR camera I have owned but isn't too big a deal as if you get the exposure correct its fine. When you get the exposure correct on an ISO of 640 or below it produces some of the best RAW files I have seen, very very sharp (no need for any extra sharpening which all my canon files need). The above shot is a nice example, it's not a good photo on my part but this is pretty much a straight Raw file that all i did was convert to black and white, my canon would need a good bit of normal processing to get this.

All in all I really liked the M8 but i believe it is certainly showing its age when it comes to technology. It is pretty slow which is no problem for me as i don't shoot that quick anyway, the ISO performance leaves a lot to be desired but it is 6 years old and when used correctly can produce amazing files.

This was my first rangefinder experience, I have always wanted to get into this style of shooting as I knew I would love it, and love it I did. Using a rangefinder for focusing was amazing, much better than any autofocus or manual focus in an SLR for my style of shooting. I also loved that is is small and very discreet, nobody cared about me photographing them on the street for the day I had to test out the camera and I got so much shots that I just wouldn't have with my 5D.  It was great to see outside the framelines and waiting for the scene to happen rather than looking through an SLR finder and not knowing whats going on outside of that little rectangle. Using the rangefinder also made lowlight focusing a pleasure, if you can see you can focus (shame the m8 can't do that great in lowlight high ISO grain performance, it's not as bad as some people say though, in black and white that is, colour is horrible, this is why you buy fast lenses). I think the M9 would do much better (well I would hope so at that price).  If the M9 could give me a nice 1600 file in colour I would be a very happy camper (when I can afford one).

All in all I hate to part with the M8 but with so many little niggles after having it for a few days (it is old and is used so this is always a possibility) and ISO performance that really isn't great for the environments I shoot in (and I can't afford a noctilux) I think I will have to return it and get something else no matter how much I want to keep it, I can't justify the price tag for a camera that I can't really get what I need out of it (really wish I could get my hands on an m9). I may either get a fuji x100 and a canon lens or two canon lenses, I'll decide over the next day or two.

There really is nothing like using a leica (even though the M8 is apparently not the best leica camera according to regular leica users) and I will buy a leica again in the future but what model i'm not sure. Maybe a nice M6 or MP and shoot some good old film.


Places to follow me online:




13 Nov 2010

Pretty Cool Canon DSLR Video with Zeiss 35mm

I just found this video online as I was searching around for reviews on the Zeiss 35mm f2 lens that i'm thinking of investing in. I like how the lens captures the video here, very clear and sharp with no vignetting and such like. I'm sure it would be great for still too. The person has done a very good job on this short video.

Anyway have a look at this

My first 7d test from Leandro Ferrão on Vimeo.