Showing posts with label initial thoughts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label initial thoughts. Show all posts

9 Jan 2012

Fuji X - Pro 1 announcement and thoughts.


So I see that Fuji are doing an announcement today. Now I am not one to get excited about flashy new camera gear unless it really is something different or especially cool. I'll admit I got a little excited about the Fuji X100 but never actually bought one as I was really waiting for an interchangeable lens version with half decent auto focus speeds, the X100 is notoriously slow and If I'm paying that much money I want something that works real good. I personally have had a Canon 5D MK 2 for a few years and have slowly gathered all my ideal lenses for that system so I am not in a hurry to start a new one or anything but there is something about Fuji right now that is pretty damn exciting. They brought out the X100 when nobody was really expecting such a camera, it was innovative and exactly what a lot of manufacturers were saying was near impossible (or would come far in the future) at the time. That hybrid viewfinder took a shit on the traditionalists approach to a rangefinder styled camera and I think we will all agree it was a brilliant step in the right direction. I am a fan of the rangefinder system and purchased a Leica M8 for a while just to get that exact experience of simplicity and discreetness (that's probably not a word) but in the end went back to the Canon SLR system for overall functionality (I am not filthy rich, other wise I would have both obviously) but I loved the small camera and the great array of lenses. There is something amazing about having a small camera and lens combo in your hand or bag compared to a big clunky SLR with big 85mm or zoom lens mounted.

When the Fuji X100 came out I was so happy that a company finally had the balls to do something creative with the small camera concept. The Panasonic and Olympus 4/3 cameras were alright but I just felt they were a bit half assed and wasn't really aimed at people who wanted great image quality, functionality and style but with a place to put your eye and look through in order to frame the picture, to be honest I didn't think it was that much to ask, basically a modernised Leica M9 that wasn't so ridiculously overpriced, doesn't have to be built to the standards of the M9, just give us a camera around the same price as a pro spec camera like the 5D MK 2/Nikon D700 with around equal image quality in a small body, surely with technology these days it's possible and Fuji really blew away the competition by coming out with the X100 and although plagued by odd flaws that really shouldn't have been there it was an amazing step in the right direction. I was always calling for a digital Zeiss Ikon. Zeiss a great company that came out with the Zeiss ikon film camera to challenge the Leica M camera's, although it came out a bit too late in my opinion it gave people a great alternative that was also affordable. I know there are probably problems with Zeiss doing this as a lot of Leica owners buy Zeiss lenses as a more affordable option after shelling out massive amounts of cash for their Leica  body and Leica probably have some agreement for Zeiss not to bring about a camera to challenge the M (maybe not but it seems so, as otherwise I believe Zeiss would be making moves to take over the market).

Now with the announcement of this new Fuji X-Pro1 it could really be the camera myself and a lot of other people have been waiting for. Almost like the digital Zeiss ikon that I have wanted for ages. It has not officially been announced yet (later today at 9pm) but I hear it will have a Leica M-mount adaptor so all them lovely Leica and Zeiss lenses will fit nicely on there, mmmmmm sounds like a nice prospect (I really like them Zeiss ZM lenses). People are also speculating whether this will be a full frame or APS-C sensor camera and whether there will be a higher spec camera released which will be the full frame pro camera and the X-pro1 will be the high end enthusiast camera. I know Leica are going to be releasing some new cameras later this year, one which will probably be a direct competitor to the Fuji X-Pro 1  with a similar hybrid viewfinder also but we will have to wait and see for that. The one thing you know about Leica is that it will be a lot more expensive which isn't really a negative thing as they know there target market and that most regular folks can't really afford there stuff. I am unfortunately or fortunately which ever way you look at it am a regular guy so naturally I want more for my money and cheer for the company who takes a creative chance to get these really cool innovative products out at a semi-affordable price.

So I for one am looking forward to this Fuji announcement today, I am rooting for them to blow away the competition again, shock the other companies into reality and to get there shit together. Instead of churning out these same camera body's one after another with very minimal differences (megapixelLeica who seemed to have slowed down and got into a back and forth rut. Although Fuji X-Pro1 isn't the same camera as a Canon 5D MK 2 or Nikon D700 but if this system works I think it will take a lot of sales away from these cameras I personally would maybe consider switching. If we can get that high image quality, great functionality and all in a much smaller package it would be really interesting. As we all know, everyone likes an underdog and that's what I think Fuji have become, the underdog that can't compete toe to toe with the big boys but instead utilises creativity and technique to pose an interesting challenge that the opponents weren't really expecting.

This could also be good for Zeiss and Leica with the M-mount adaptor announcement. I'm sure Fuji will bring out more great lenses but a lot of people will love to put the Zeiss ZM and Leica M lenses onto this camera and I'm sure sales will go up, in Zeiss especially as they are affordable but with that amazing image quality.

When I started writing this it was originally going to be a few lines of text saying how I was looking forward to this announcement and how much I hoped for something really special from Fuji but It looks like I had some more views on this products and the current state of digital cameras in general, oh well it was nice to put these thoughts into text. I really like that Fuji are doing something different and at least attempting to shake up the status quo for the better which is always a good thing. It's great for us photographers and keeps things interesting, I like to have options and it looks like we will have some interesting decisions to make in the near future about our main camera systems.

Basically someone in Fuji is pushing boundaries and being creative as possible, I for one love it, even if I don't end up buying the camera. Keep it coming.

Feel free to leave any comments, opinions or emails on your Fuji X-Pro 1 thoughts or if you agree or disagree with anything I have said. 


Places to follow me online:




16 Aug 2011

Carl Zeiss Distagon 35 f2 ZE (Initial Thoughts)



My new lens purchase. I have been looking to add to my lens line up for mt Canon 5d mk 2 for a while now. To be honest I had been feeling a little unimpressed with the range of Canon lenses on offer, not that they to don't perform well and create great images as they do. I have used mainly Canon lenses for a while and have beeen the staple for all the images I have shot but alongside them I have been shooting old manual focus lenses such as my Olympus zuiko 100mm f2.8, Olympus 24mm and Haminex 28mm f2.8 (shooting for fun, not on jobs) and to be honest I enjoyed the process much more with them, I can't explain why, although i think that it could be that I feel more involved with the image (manual focus etc).

Since I have went pro recently I have been looking at the Canon L series and the cheaper yet good prime EF lens range. I thought these were my only options. But I recently tried and bought a Sigma 85 f1.4 as after extensive testing I liked it more in a practical sense than any of the canon 85's and it got me starting to think about 3rd party lenses as an alternative to the canons (if they perform well that is, not just for the sake of it, I have nothing against Canon).

This is when I actually thought about selling all my Canon kit and getting a Leica m9 as after trying a Leica m8 with a Zeiss 28mm f2.8 lens I fell in love with how the lenses functioned(such smooth manual focus and operation) and the high build quality and sharpness straight out of camera. Then on second thoughts I actually really did like the 5D MK2 for its great high ISO performance (Leica is not there yet in ISO abilities) I shoot in lowlight a lot and don't use flash all that much so decided to stick with the Canon.

I loved that the Zeiss lens I used on the M8 was made of metal and felt so sturdy, I wouldn't ever worry about in a field situation, felt like it was built to last forever, I hate the plastic construction of the canon lenses and I have went through a few.

So I started to look into the Carl Zeiss lens range for the Canon mount (the ZE line) as I had heard great things in the past about their wide angle 21mm f2.8 but never really looked too much into it at the time. After a quick search online a lot of great praise was found for nearly all the Zeiss line with the exception of the Zeiss 50 f1.4 and 85 f1.4 when used wide open (or so I have been told, I'm sure their fine though if you know how to use them).

I saw that a lot of pros said that they loved them but wouldn't use the on assignment due to them being manual focus only, but I thought screw that, I have been manually focusing since getting into cameras as I find that when working quick and close autofocus can be quite unreliable (atleast in my experiences). The Zeiss lenses do have the autofocus confirmation when it hits the focus so really you have the best of both worlds but within a much better built body and in some cases superior image quality.

I have heard a lot about the Zeiss 3d rendering quality, people saying that is just amazing and can't be reached by any Canon L lens. The Zeiss in a lot of cases are cheaper than the Canons or around the same price. All this sounds great but I thought it must be too good to be true.

So I thought F**k it and just ordered the Zeiss Distagon 35 f2 which is a focal length I have wanted for a long time (and was about the same focal length equivalent  as the 28mm i used on the Leica m8) and the Canon ef 35 f2 is plastic with a pretty crap manual focus ring (but is nice and light) and the Canon 35 f1.4 L costs over £400 more than the zeiss but does have that nice 1.4 though. I really wanted to try the zeiss though.

It arrived today and I really wasn't expecting too much to be honest but when I opened the box I was immediately impressed with the look and build and it was actually a lot lighter than I thought which was a nice surprise. After mounting it on the camera it felt really nice, well balanced on the 5D MK2  and with the EG-S precision matte focus screen manual focus is very easy and everything snaps into focus no problem and the focus conformation works really well too for when you don't want to rely solely on your eye to do the work.

After taking a few shots with it (nothing to interesting yet as it's raining outside and nothing worth posting) I now understand what people say about the Zeiss rendering. It just looks amazing. The colours straight out of camera are really nice, better than any canon lens I have used (in my opinion) and I have used  a good amount of L's in the past. The images from at least this lens do have that 3d rendering quality and it is sharp from f2, there is some vignetting at f2 but is to be expected and is no problem when in actual use and actually gives the images a great look. It makes Jpegs out of camera look really good which is a feat.

I have only shot a couple of images so far but I wanted to write this as I was so impressed and it actually has already surpassed my expectations which is something I have yet to experience with any other lens. I am now already considering another purchase maybe the 28 f2 for that slightly wider field of view in tight situations. My only regret in buying this lens is that I didn't get the new 35 f1.4 version but that is bigger, heavier and more expensive at around £1500.

I think if you can do without autofocus (you do get autofocus confirmation though) then the Zeiss line is a great investment, well I can at least confirm that the 35 f2 is a stunning lens and I will be purchasing more (probably the wider lenses though, the 28 , 25 or 21). I still have my Canon 50 f1.4, Sigma 85 f1.4 and I am still very happy with their results (well maybe not the 50 too much wide open) but for moments when I want autofocus and for traditional portraits these will still be my go to lenses I haven't given up the Canon's yet but the Zeiss image quality makes me want to. Certain situations call for certain lenses and as long as you use the right one for you to get the best image, thats all that matters.  I love though that for that photojournalistic, street and environmental portraits I will have my Zeiss 35 to go to from now on.

I am not a fan of reviews that photograph test charts to judge lenses and much prefer to read what people think after taking some real world shots and experiences. While looking at this lens I didn't find too much info on it in this manner so thought I would do a quick write up (which has turned into a long write up) and I will do a follow up once I have shot with it a bit more. I just hope this might help someone who was in the same position as me looking at the Zeiss line (or at least this 35 f2).

Cheers!

www.drewportfolio.com

UPDATE!! SOME QUICK TEST IMAGES!

These files really have barely been touched in post. I put on my usual sharpening that I do on all my images (just a small amount) and boosted the contrast a little on a few but for most part this is all the lens.
Some are straight out of camera JPEG which is something I have never been impressed with before.
The images aren't good but I just wanted to do a quick test.


Shot at f2 and focused on the silver barrier in the middle of the image.
Pretty damn good for f2, I love the contrast and clarity. 


This is just a black and white version of the above image for reference. 
I love the straight out of camera B&W's, This lens makes me 
want to shoot JPeg it is so good in clarity, colour and contrast.


Hello! Me in my bathroom mirror (the top of the mirror is steamed up as I wasn't 
long out the shower. Very nice feeling to this image. Shot at f2 and focused on my hair.


Me taken by Cat in Bar Bloc. I wanted to test my new Zeiss lens in a lowlight environment but the light on Cat at this part of the bar was pretty crap and all the cool bar lights were behind me so she took a couple shots to get that lovely out of focus goodness. Look how nice that lens renders the colours, beautiful! Zeiss lenses from now on I thinks. Hardly anything to do in post and sharp wide open, love it.  Getting the 28 now too, I've got the bug. 


On the set of new film World War Z, starring Brad Pitt.
The guy with the umbrella was the main focus, I like the girl talking to the worker with the ladder too. A lot going on here, I like it. 



Straight out of camera JPEG with the smallest amount of contrast added (pretty much nothing +1 i think). It was about to rain bad and I saw this homeless guy that hangs around this area leaning against the rail (just to the right of the centre of the frame) so put the lens to f2 and focused on him. Again great image quality and this is a jpeg straight out of camera, crazy good. Cuts my post processing
time down to pretty much nothing, amazing and thats with Raw files too. 


Another straight out of camera JPEG with a very small amount of contrast added (+1 I think, very small amount). Again it was a very dull and rainy day and thats why the image is so dark. I love how
the Zeiss rendered the shot. F2 focused on the water droplets. 

Thats it for now. I am very impressed with this lens. Very sharp, great colour and great contrast and it makes JPEG's straight out of camera look great which is unreal and after processing Raw files the images are even more stunning and thats without doing to much to the file atall, less than I normally do with my other leneses. Love this 35 and will be checking out either the 28 or 21 Zeiss in the very near future.

Places to follow me online: